As per international best practices we normally append a Standard form of Contract with the Bid Documents used for inviting bids. Once the preferred bidder is selected, the contract is signed using the Standard Form of Contract. Most of the procuring entities diligently review the Standard form of Contract before signing and prepare Appendixes taking in to account the bid submitted by the selected bidder. Once the contract is signed, it takes precedence over to all previous documents exchanged between two parties, such as Bid Document, Clarifications and Amendments issued and even the bid submitted by the selected bidder. The Contract so drafted should be a comprehensive document to be referred during currency of the contract and is treated as a legally enforceable document.
Most of the problems in enforcing contract arises when discrepancy remains in capturing all necessary details from the documents transacted between the two parties prior to signing of contract. In Public Sector, drafting contract is not taken as seriously as the private sector. We often rely on Standard Form of Contract without much changes. No doubt, the Standard Form of Contract can be a guiding document, but it can’t be taken as good for signing without much deliberation.
At the time of bidding we can’t foresee all circumstances concerning successful implementation of contract. At the time of publishing bid invitation notice we don’t know nationality of bidder, source of supplies and other allied details. However, once the preferred bidder is selected, the Standard Form of Contract need thorough review to make it a workable and enforceable document. For example, the inspection and testing requirements as given in the Standard form of Contract of the Bid Document may contain various options to choose from, viz. inspection and tests may be conducted on the premises of the Supplier or its Subcontractor, at point of delivery, and/or at the Goods’ final destination, or in another place in the Purchaser’s Country. At the time of finalising contract, the required and feasible option for inspection and testing need to be selected to serve the purpose of ensuring that the equipment supplied is as per technical specifications. This provision, if left open ended may result in to problems in enforcing the inspection and testing requirements.
Likewise, in case of civil works contract, the selected contractor might have proposed key personnel and other staff to be deployed for execution of contract and in case we slip to incorporate names, qualification and experience of such key personnel and other staff in the final contract we might not be in a position or even fail to demand for same personnel while executing the contract and in turn contractor may take liberty in deploying fewer and / or lesser qualified staff while executing contract which may affect timely execution of contract and quality of work.
In case of consultancy contract if we fail to incorporate methodology and work plan, list of key personnel proposed by the selected consultant, we might fail to achieve intended quality of services rendered by the consultant. Even the terms of Reference might need lots of rework considering the technical proposal submitted by the selected consultant.
The well drafted, self-contained and comprehensive contract document is prerequisite for procurement of goods, works and services. Slippages in diligently capturing all necessary details from documents transacted prior to award of contract between the two parties might result in poor enforcement of contract and affect successful delivery of goods, works and services and may even lead to litigation.